Free shipping on all orders over $50
7-15 days international
27 people viewing this product right now!
30-day free returns
Secure checkout
68595904
Remember the days of longing for the hands on the classroom clock to move faster? Most of us would say we love to learn, but we hated school. Why is that? What happens to creativity and individuality as we pass through the educational system?Walking on Water is a startling and provocative look at teaching, writing, creativity, and life by a writer increasingly recognized for his passionate and articulate critique of modern civilization. This time Derrick Jensen brings us into his classroom--whether college or maximum security prison--where he teaches writing. He reveals how schools perpetuate the great illusion that happiness lies outside of ourselves and that learning to please and submit to those in power makes us into lifelong clock-watchers. As a writing teacher Jensen guides his students out of the confines of traditional education to find their own voices, freedom, and creativity.Jensen's great gift as a teacher and writer is to bring us fully alive at the same moment he is making us confront our losses and count our defeats. It is at the center of Walking on Water, a book that is not only a hard-hitting and sometimes scathing critique of our current educational system and not only a hands-on method for learning how to write, but, like Julia Cameron'sThe Artist's Way, a lesson on how to connect to the core of our creative selves, to the miracle of waking up and arriving breathless (but with dry feet) on the far shore.
Book Review: Walking on Water by Derrick JensenDerrick Jensen teaches writing at Eastern Washington University and a high security prison. He invites us into his coaching mind and classrooms. I missed at first that it was really a college level class, thinking he was addressing a group of high school kids or dropouts. It quickly becomes apparent however, that some language or comments could be inappropriate for certain of these groups. I do not mind so much the expression he employs, more to the point and very simply, the style will probably only be relevant to particular audiences. His passion challenges the boredom one encounters at school with entertainment and wit. I am no longer in the school system he criticizes, not in jail either, not bored, and I have self-motivation. Can I still be interested in reading this book? Jensen covers a wide range of subjects that do not exactly fall within the rubrics of READING, WRITING, AND REVOLUTION, as indicated by the subtitle.His main contention is with the traditional education system. True, this system can be stifling. However, is it really why there is such a level of illiteracy in American schools and universities? Traditional education in other industrialized nations is perhaps just as stifling, and probably even more so in some instances. But with less recreation and sports and more instructional hours, the level of literacy is higher. I also speak from experience since I am an educator working in a public university system in the U. S. and consider as alarming the current level of remedial help needed. Data evidence shows a clear decline in literacy in the last decade. From this standpoint, if Jensen’s quirkiness and spirit can motivate a creative form of learning, we need more people like him.Most of us I believe can remember long hours in school, bored, and just waiting for recess. Here Jensen’s investigations are absolutely relevant: “What else did I learn? I learned to not talk out of order, and to not question authority—not openly, at least—for fear of losing recess time, or later of losing grade points. I learned to not ask difficult questions of overburdened or impatient teachers, and certainly not to expect thoughtful answers. I learned to mimic the opinions of teachers, and on command to vomit facts and interpretations of those facts gleaned from textbooks, whether I agreed with the facts or interpretations or not.”These few lines trigger some memories of my own; learning facts, lots of facts, learning by rote instead of developing critical thinking skills. I recognize how this applies at all levels of study, and how one needs to stay critical of one’s learning processes.“I learned how to read authority figures, give them what they wanted, to fawn and brownnose when expedient. In short, I learned to give myself away.” Is there any possibility that we may do this as well in other areas of our life, beyond school? Giving ourselves away just like that? How vigilant are we? Could my own contributions lean in a particular direction, follow a particular opinion, just to satisfy what I think is expected? I believe this can be continually examined in one’s work, one’s writing, whatever creative pursuit one is engaged in. Vigilance can be invited in this manner throughout one’s life. It also questions how one is committed to developing a life of personal meaning and support the unfolding of an authentic voice. From this standpoint, I find Jensen’s questioning to be relevant beyond what I thought was directed to a particular audience needing “rehabilitation.”“We hear, more or less constantly, that schools are failing in their mandate. Nothing could be more wrong. Schools are succeeding all too well, accomplishing precisely their purpose. And what is their primary purpose? To answer this, ask yourself first what society values most. We don’t talk about it much, but the truth is that our society values money above all else, in part because it represents power, and in part because, as is also true of power, it gives us the illusion that we can get what we want. But one of the costs of following money is that in order to acquire it, we so often have to give ourselves away to whomever has money to give in return. Bosses, corporations, men with nice cars, women with power suits. Teachers.”What society values most is money, Jensen writes. He points to schools preparing minds, from a very young age, to become the future earners, the cogs in the big money machine. This perspective creates some discomfort for sure as there is more to life than just harvesting achievement through money. We do read that liberal education is fast disappearing. Education concedes knowledge and the development of critical abilities, to money which becomes its directive agent, and primary purpose.The author asks his students, if they were given a million dollars, would they stay in school. They want a little more than a million, but even with that, most of them answer they would leave. They would have better things to do with their life. Similarly, if people who work in my college department were given a million dollars, would they remain in their current position? I do not believe they would.What is wrong with this picture? Traditional education can be blamed for failing to meet the creativity and liveliness students need. Similarly, the traditional workplace continues in the same vein, falling short to satisfy basic human needs: feeling valued, having a sense of purpose, worthiness, and making a contribution.Jensen’s book raises ideas that make one think. It is a mixed bag at times, even longwinded, as I caught myself skimming entire pages or sections. However, we witness a creative mind hooking the interest of his students, at times breaking into their psyche in whichever way he can, all of it meant to inspire and give confidence.Derrick Jensen has written a number of other books: A Language Older than Words, The Culture of Make Believe, Listening to the Land, Strangely Like War, Welcome to the Machine, and Walking on Water. He also writes for The New York Times Magazine, Audubon, and The Sun Magazine among many others.